Thursday, December 17, 2009
rituals - and making sense of them..
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
How to manage a DUD!! ask KP Singh
Sunday, December 13, 2009
2012 - apocalypse NOW!!
Saturday, December 5, 2009
The death of the unborn & living the American dream..
Monday, November 30, 2009
Auditors and an election
Sunday, November 29, 2009
google and how its tackling the recession


Saturday, November 28, 2009
Clubs, schools and education..
missing children and the sarva siksha abhiyan (SSA)
Friday, November 27, 2009
doobye
Dont go with the herd Mr Hirohisa Fuji
Thursday, November 26, 2009
Brother Vs Brother - Charade continues
Medical tourism
Monday, November 23, 2009
Feeling claustrophobic - just open the window!!
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
how to make 4000 into 5000?
life of ahimsa..
There is a Q raised on this - "Does it mean that, his message must be carried out in the same way, only with our life" - FB user
Thursday, November 12, 2009
relentless march of capitalism..
SME Exchange/ Platform:
Ø 1. Companies listed on the SME exchanges would be exempted from the eligibility norms applicable for IPOs and FPOs prescribed in the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009 (ICDR).
Instead of a blanket exemption - those provisions seen as onerous could have been exempted. Looks like some vested interests need a quick turnaround in this to create the next "big" thing in investment banking(IB).
Ø 2. In order to have informed, financ
All the more easier for these IB's to sell rubbish as most of the HNI's dont have time for research as they are busy making money. Only professional investors have the time to separate the rubbish from the good but they are anyways investing before the same is marketed by the friendly neighborhood IB.
Ø 3. The minimum trading lot would be Rs. 1 lakh.
Why?
Ø 4. An upper limit of Rs. 25 crore paid up capital would be prescribed in order for a company to be listed on the SME platform/exchange and a minimum paid up capital of Rs.10 crore would be prescribed for listing on the main boards of NSE and BSE.
What about those companies with paid in capital of less than 10Cr currently listed in the exchanges and who have no problems in meeting all the current requirements? Why are they being allowed to be exempted from takeover and public offer norms? This is the vested interest part discussed in point 1 above.
Ø 5. The offer document will have to be filed with SEBI and the exchange. No observations would be issued by SEBI on the offer documents filed by the Merchant Bankers (MBs).
Kindly elaborate puhleeazsee...
Ø 6. The MB to the issue will bear the responsibility for market making for a minimum period of three years. MBs would be allowed to do market making along with a disclosed nominated investor (like PE, VC, HNI and QIB). Under this arrangement, all the stock being bought and sold as part of market making will ultimately get transferred to the disclosed nominated investor with whom the Merchant Banker has a contractual agreement. Merchant Banker would have to disclose their intention of this arrangement and have it approved by stock exchanges where the issuer SME is listed.
Why this provision at all? Isnt the past lessons very clear that when a group of people corner a portion of shares of a company they will always manipulate its price? The better option would have been to deepen the bond market for these SME's instead of a charade of an IPO.
Ø 7. Certain well capit
Well capitalised - Would you consider RIL to be well capitalised? Kindly define the parameters instead of some adjectival drivel.
Ø 8. During the compulsory market making period, promoters/acquirers will be allowed to dilute their shareholding only through offer for sale or to an acquirer and not to a market maker.
It would be so convenient that every time a promoter sells there is a matching buyer who has been "recommended" the stock by an IB!!
Ø 9. SEBI regulations on Takeover (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers Regulations) will not be applicable to acquisition of shares through Merchant Banker /Market Maker provided that the Merchant Banker/Market Maker does not have the intention of taking over the management and there is no change in control (direct /indirect) of the company.
Well I dont intend to take over but as it so happens one fine day Narayan Murty decides to step down in the name of succession planning and viola the MB/ IB's man becomes the new chairman. convenient aint it?
Ø 10. Merchant Bankers who have the responsibility of market making and have a firm allotment made in IPO for purpose of market making may, at their option, be represented on the board of directors of the company in view of the commitment of market making subject to agreement of the issuer. However this will not be mandatory on the Merchant Banker.
Excuse me - come again - it is compulsory on the issuer to "offer" a Board seat and it is not compulsory for the MB to accept the same? Now how is this different from what one fears in point 9 from happening?
Ø 11. No separate category of Merchant Bankers will be created.
Why not? This only strengthens point 1 above - you can however bet that once the creme de la creme of the SME's have gone public a separate set of MB's would be allowed as the current MB's wont be bothered with the REAL SME's now will they?
Ø 12. Merchant Bankers will be required to ensure that the issue is 100% underwritten. However only a minimum percentage (15%) of the issue size will be mandated to be compulsorily underwritten by the Merchant Banker itself.
Now why is the 15% limit allowed I WONDER?
Ø 13. A minimum number of investors (say 50) shall be specified for the IPO only. There shall be no continuing requirement of maintaining the minimum number of investors. However, compliance with the requirements of Companies Act, 1956 needs to be ensured at all times.
LOL..- better to call this the back door way for all the PE/ VC managers who are stuck with their lemons to sell on the great Indian share mandi!!
Ø 14. No separate registration will be required for brokers intending to service companies listed on the SME exchange/platform.
What service do brokers directly provide companies currently i would like to know? As far as I am aware they provide services to the INVESTOR community to buy or sell stocks - period. Is this the unintended slip that shows the level of vested interest drafting the guideline that SEBI even forgot to remove the "private comments" of the MB/ IB/ VC/ PE before making the document public? LOLOL
Ø 15. Companies listed on the SME exchange/platform shall compulsorily migrate to an equity exchange/segment (main board) on exceeding the Rs 25 crore post issue paid up capital limit. Further also, if follow on offer/rights issue results in triggering of the above limit (of Rs. 25 crore) then the company would have to migrate to the main board.
First instance of principle of natural justice and application of LOGIC i guess - DUH
Ø 16. Companies listed on the SME exchange/ platform of an existing exchange may send to their shareholders a statement containing the salient features of all the documents as prescribed in section 219 (1) (b) (iv) of Companies Act, 1956. This information shall also be displayed on the website of the exchange. Further the Company shall compulsorily maintain a website on which this information can be displayed.
Many main board companies themselves dont do this. Now why insist on this for SME's I WONDER?
Ø 17. Investors with holdings of value less than Rs. 1,00,000 (such reduction in the holding may have been due to fall in prices or his having offloaded a part of the holdings previously), are allowed to off load their holding to the Market Maker in that scrip. (provided that the investor sells his entire holding in that scrip in one lot). Market Makers will be authorised to buy these shares from such investors.
Makes managing points 6 & 8 that much easier. !! LOL..
Ø 18. Preparation and submission of financial results (as mandated in the listing agreement) on a “half yearly basis” for SMEs, instead of “quarterly basis”.
Why cant they publish them monthly - what are they saving here? Any company has a status report daily in any case and so dont see the need for this relaxation.
Ø 19. All the provisions of clause 49 (corporate governance) need to be complied with.
First sensible guideline but then a true case of too little too late??
In short a pathetic attempt at pulling the wool over the investors eyes and coming from the market regulator - this is a new low for Indian capitalism!!
The biggest scam in this is the paid in capital as the benchmark. For eg. a company like MRF has a paid in capital of 4 crores. But its market cap is in excess of 2400Crores. So should not the definition be a combination of paid in equity and market cap say paid in equity of 25 crores and a market cap below 500crores or some such thing? DUH!!
Capitalism - can i have some Mo(o)re..
Monday, November 9, 2009
Cost or Price?
Thursday, November 5, 2009
one more monument of corruption
Friday, October 30, 2009
dealing in death
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
reinventing price?
Sunday, August 16, 2009
hum mur
Saturday, August 15, 2009
homeland security, a president and an actor
PFRDA - printers devil?

i only hope the rate of INR2500/sft is a typo and not what is intended!!
Friday, August 7, 2009
water finds its own level..
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
brother Vs brother
Monday, August 3, 2009
bailout anyone..
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
lemmings, the sea and going green
Friday, July 17, 2009
central clearing - derivatives
illegal v legal
too big to fail
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
SBIn - the Ye(N) drops
Friday, July 10, 2009
AI and JUGAAD
The other option was for offering to compensate some passenger for voluntary deboarding. Instead the logic used by the pilot was to accomodate these passengers in seats other wise valid (just not earmarked for passengers!!). This is the JUGAAD which in my opinion saw the matter resolved without any tension to any passenger. Of course if this were to become routine then it raises security issues as of course you cant have anybody in the cockpit other than the pilots!! A one off JUGAAD like this will of course lead to some rejig in the preflight checklist and maybe some serious censure of the officials concerned with the happenings on in AI179 but then frankly I dont think the technical integrity of the flight was ever in doubt as most of the news channels would like you to believe!!
Those extra seats are there and if people were sitting in those seats i dont see any technical threat - yes the issues of violating rules and security measures still remain - but then whats a little bit of Jugaad if you cant streatch the limits of the rules!!
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
jugaad
why is it the world is now recognising the virtue of jugaad? well its simple - in these times of recession and awakened awareness of the environment jugaad is the way to go as it is cost effective and also leaves a lesser impact on the environment. read the entire article at:
http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13754045&CFID=58679420&CFTOKEN=44655792
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Seigniorage
Governments can use this as an added tool to lessen the impact of inflation by issuing new designs every time they issue new currency so that there is a never ending Seigniorage accruing to them.
Monday, April 6, 2009
american dream redefined?
as a guy visiting this country for the first time P911 the differences are most striking as compared to my earlier B911 visits.
the all pervading "fear factor" and the paranoia of security hangs like a pall of gloom - portenders of some impending disaster. it is indeed sad that what we took for granted in the past is no more the case - for eg visit to the white house, walk up the statue of liberty, minimum fuss in airports so on and so forth.
BUT the guys in charge of security are making their personal individual efforts to make life comfortable (with rare exceptions) for the citizens and visitors alike in these trying times. the guys at immigration were more helpful, the guys at homeland security at the domestic airport were most accomodating as we were travelling with 2 kids wrt to our needs but at the same time declining to allow certain items past security (which in india we are allowed and we have had homeland security now for over 2 decades)!!
the recent downturn hasnt helped the american dream with a spate of shootings by "regular joes". in all this the administration is strained and one can only expect furthur restrictions on what we take for granted today.
at times one wonders if all the money on security and the war machine cant be better deployed ?!! maybe terror is winning slowly like a cancer in this "fear" country. dont know.
on an aside "Jack Windolf, the CEO of Bollinger Insurance, recently gave his 434 employees a surprise gift: out of his own pocket, he paid each of them $1000" - it is such acts which define the spiritual wealth of a nation - maybe the american dream is being redefined?
Thursday, March 19, 2009
cdo's
Finally some serious action in limiting the free for all casino that was going on for the past decade. It is an open secret that this kind of limiting has to be extended to the commodity markets as well so that only end users and producers can buy and sell. Secondly the total outstanding in the market at any point in time should not exceed the actual capacity that is available for extraction for that particular commodity. with a 100% cash margin or BG for all sale and buy deals this would guarantee that we dont see commodities as an investment - hence making sure that the best price is attained with actual demand against actual supply as against the artificial demand when liquity is good and artificial supply when the liquidity dries up.
coming back to the reported news item - would the exchange for counter party clearing be allowed to be set up? readers can form their own opinion keeping the track record of the regulators in managing the financial markets from S&L,barings, enron, et al till date..
Monday, March 16, 2009
it happens only in india?
"[T]he Louisiana Republican Senator David Vitter arrived Thursday evening at his United Airlines gate 20 minutes before the plane was scheduled to depart, only to find the gate had already been closed. Undeterred, Vitter opened the door, setting off a security alarm and prompting an airline worker to warn him that entering the gate was forbidden.Vitter, our spy said, gave the airline worker an earful, employing the timeworn "do-you-know-who-I-am" tirade that apparently grew quite heated.That led to some back and forth, and the worker announced to the irritable Vitter that he was going to summon security.Vitter, according to the witness, remained defiant, yelling that the employee could call the police if he wanted to and their supervisors, who, presumably, might be more impressed with his Senator's pin.But after talking a huffy big game, Vitter apparently thought better of pushing the confrontation any further. When the gate attendant left to find a security guard, Vitter turned tail and simply fled the scene. Adding insult to injury, the latest report is that the TSA is investigating the incident. If found to be in violation of TSA regulations, Vitter could face thousands of dollars in fines."
"another recent aviation incident, in which Sen. Charles E. Schumer persuaded a US Airways shuttle to depart New York early so he could make an important vote."
and to think that only in third world countries this kind of pulling rank happened? has the recession pushed america into a third world country too? SAVE america so that the teeming billions of the world can continue to aspire for living the "american dream" - for without this thirst from the teeming billions of the world there would be no demand for the dollar and hence no "dollar dreams" as well.
Friday, March 13, 2009
be afraid - be very afraid
matters arent helped with china upping the ante to embaress the US with its side remark about the credit worthiness of the US treasury notes that its holds. as supply of the paper increases china does not see itself spending what it holds fast enough before the treasury notes becomes worthless pieces of paper. that brings us to the next question?
is the world economy ready to shift back to the gold standard from the current dollar standard?
what are the implications?
first and foremost - the price of gold will got through the roof to adjust for the increased supply of notes since governements went off the standard. for eg if the US had 1 trillion $'s in supply in 1950 and it now has say 20 trillion $'s then the price of gold has to be 20 times plus a minor adjustment for demand supply economics as it is also a commodity used in various medical equipments/ computers and most recently in nano technology.
this upward revision in the price of gold will suddently make every indian/ chinese etc who have traditionaly bought gold as a hedge against inflation to benefit as their gold would now come to its true value as against the paper monsters that they currently carry which has no real value backing it other than the "perceived" currency value in relation to other countries and also the "perceived" governenance value in relation to other countries.
Monday, March 9, 2009
admin
in the good old days they were civil servants who held your life in those dusty files preserved for posterity in cavernous rooms and filing cabinets.
in todays world they are computer geeks who control the passwords to sensitive data centres. the issue is who has a right to control these passwords? how are these password keepers to be police(d)?
my personal experience has been to leave the admin password to the main server with the owner of the company and get all high level changes in the network code to be done only in the owners presence or his representative with proper background logging of all the activities to enable checking by a third party before the changes are accepted and allowed into the system.
now how would this work in a public system like say a government office? here in india most government offices are under the maintainance of NIC. staff employed there are the people with access to enormous amounts of sensitive data and a lot of them have in the past left government service and joined private sector companies. this puts the entire public record keeping system at risk as there is no visible public policy on password storage and its management issued by the government of india.
the risks of not having such a policy need not be repeated as a single breach of sensitive government records might compromise the security of financial/ personal data of millions of its citizens. i dont see the president or primeminister of a nation to be involved in this but technically as the owners to the data, they are ultimately responsible for the safekeeping of the data collected for "governmental work". big brother is watching - just we dont know which "admin" where is having a peek at your personal records!!
Saturday, March 7, 2009
scam yuga
Thursday, March 5, 2009
IFRS and (un)fair value
The fair value concept allows more "ad hoc" methods to be adopted as there are multifarious methods of valuing various assets. It is heartening to know that the very advocates of "fair value" are now calling for a review of this concept as the current "credit crunch" forces banks and financial institutions to "write down" their assets as there is no liquidity for these investments and hence rather difficult to ascertain their fair value!!
The other major issue is that of ESOPS being charged to revenue - this is basically a revenue neutral transaction as far as the company is concerned and it only impacts the shareholders - so other than creating secret reserves and artificially reducing the profits in the books of companies this hasnt really helped.
who is James Otis?
"James Otis has set conditions before the Indian government in order to withdraw Gandhi's items from the auction, if the Indian government agrees either to spend more on healthcare for the poor or support educational events to promote Gandhi's principles of non-violence in 78 (the years Gandhi lived) countries across the world. He also wanted the Indian government to cut its military spending. The letter was sent to the Indian Consulate General in New York and forwarded to the MEA in India. The items that will go under the hammer include Mahatma Gandhi's metal-rimed spectacles, pocket watch, a pair of sandals, a bowl and a plate. The items have a reserve price of between $20,000 and $30,000."
The buzz for the past week has been this man James Otis - the more one hears and reads about him you have to but just wonder. The mysterious hand of "god" (fate) might just prove to be greater than the "hand" which has been with the "aam aadmi" in the upcoming elections.
James Otis for PM anybody?