Monday, November 30, 2009
Auditors and an election
Sunday, November 29, 2009
google and how its tackling the recession


Saturday, November 28, 2009
Clubs, schools and education..
missing children and the sarva siksha abhiyan (SSA)
Friday, November 27, 2009
doobye
Dont go with the herd Mr Hirohisa Fuji
Thursday, November 26, 2009
Brother Vs Brother - Charade continues
Medical tourism
Monday, November 23, 2009
Feeling claustrophobic - just open the window!!
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
how to make 4000 into 5000?
life of ahimsa..
There is a Q raised on this - "Does it mean that, his message must be carried out in the same way, only with our life" - FB user
Thursday, November 12, 2009
relentless march of capitalism..
SME Exchange/ Platform:
Ø 1. Companies listed on the SME exchanges would be exempted from the eligibility norms applicable for IPOs and FPOs prescribed in the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009 (ICDR).
Instead of a blanket exemption - those provisions seen as onerous could have been exempted. Looks like some vested interests need a quick turnaround in this to create the next "big" thing in investment banking(IB).
Ø 2. In order to have informed, financ
All the more easier for these IB's to sell rubbish as most of the HNI's dont have time for research as they are busy making money. Only professional investors have the time to separate the rubbish from the good but they are anyways investing before the same is marketed by the friendly neighborhood IB.
Ø 3. The minimum trading lot would be Rs. 1 lakh.
Why?
Ø 4. An upper limit of Rs. 25 crore paid up capital would be prescribed in order for a company to be listed on the SME platform/exchange and a minimum paid up capital of Rs.10 crore would be prescribed for listing on the main boards of NSE and BSE.
What about those companies with paid in capital of less than 10Cr currently listed in the exchanges and who have no problems in meeting all the current requirements? Why are they being allowed to be exempted from takeover and public offer norms? This is the vested interest part discussed in point 1 above.
Ø 5. The offer document will have to be filed with SEBI and the exchange. No observations would be issued by SEBI on the offer documents filed by the Merchant Bankers (MBs).
Kindly elaborate puhleeazsee...
Ø 6. The MB to the issue will bear the responsibility for market making for a minimum period of three years. MBs would be allowed to do market making along with a disclosed nominated investor (like PE, VC, HNI and QIB). Under this arrangement, all the stock being bought and sold as part of market making will ultimately get transferred to the disclosed nominated investor with whom the Merchant Banker has a contractual agreement. Merchant Banker would have to disclose their intention of this arrangement and have it approved by stock exchanges where the issuer SME is listed.
Why this provision at all? Isnt the past lessons very clear that when a group of people corner a portion of shares of a company they will always manipulate its price? The better option would have been to deepen the bond market for these SME's instead of a charade of an IPO.
Ø 7. Certain well capit
Well capitalised - Would you consider RIL to be well capitalised? Kindly define the parameters instead of some adjectival drivel.
Ø 8. During the compulsory market making period, promoters/acquirers will be allowed to dilute their shareholding only through offer for sale or to an acquirer and not to a market maker.
It would be so convenient that every time a promoter sells there is a matching buyer who has been "recommended" the stock by an IB!!
Ø 9. SEBI regulations on Takeover (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers Regulations) will not be applicable to acquisition of shares through Merchant Banker /Market Maker provided that the Merchant Banker/Market Maker does not have the intention of taking over the management and there is no change in control (direct /indirect) of the company.
Well I dont intend to take over but as it so happens one fine day Narayan Murty decides to step down in the name of succession planning and viola the MB/ IB's man becomes the new chairman. convenient aint it?
Ø 10. Merchant Bankers who have the responsibility of market making and have a firm allotment made in IPO for purpose of market making may, at their option, be represented on the board of directors of the company in view of the commitment of market making subject to agreement of the issuer. However this will not be mandatory on the Merchant Banker.
Excuse me - come again - it is compulsory on the issuer to "offer" a Board seat and it is not compulsory for the MB to accept the same? Now how is this different from what one fears in point 9 from happening?
Ø 11. No separate category of Merchant Bankers will be created.
Why not? This only strengthens point 1 above - you can however bet that once the creme de la creme of the SME's have gone public a separate set of MB's would be allowed as the current MB's wont be bothered with the REAL SME's now will they?
Ø 12. Merchant Bankers will be required to ensure that the issue is 100% underwritten. However only a minimum percentage (15%) of the issue size will be mandated to be compulsorily underwritten by the Merchant Banker itself.
Now why is the 15% limit allowed I WONDER?
Ø 13. A minimum number of investors (say 50) shall be specified for the IPO only. There shall be no continuing requirement of maintaining the minimum number of investors. However, compliance with the requirements of Companies Act, 1956 needs to be ensured at all times.
LOL..- better to call this the back door way for all the PE/ VC managers who are stuck with their lemons to sell on the great Indian share mandi!!
Ø 14. No separate registration will be required for brokers intending to service companies listed on the SME exchange/platform.
What service do brokers directly provide companies currently i would like to know? As far as I am aware they provide services to the INVESTOR community to buy or sell stocks - period. Is this the unintended slip that shows the level of vested interest drafting the guideline that SEBI even forgot to remove the "private comments" of the MB/ IB/ VC/ PE before making the document public? LOLOL
Ø 15. Companies listed on the SME exchange/platform shall compulsorily migrate to an equity exchange/segment (main board) on exceeding the Rs 25 crore post issue paid up capital limit. Further also, if follow on offer/rights issue results in triggering of the above limit (of Rs. 25 crore) then the company would have to migrate to the main board.
First instance of principle of natural justice and application of LOGIC i guess - DUH
Ø 16. Companies listed on the SME exchange/ platform of an existing exchange may send to their shareholders a statement containing the salient features of all the documents as prescribed in section 219 (1) (b) (iv) of Companies Act, 1956. This information shall also be displayed on the website of the exchange. Further the Company shall compulsorily maintain a website on which this information can be displayed.
Many main board companies themselves dont do this. Now why insist on this for SME's I WONDER?
Ø 17. Investors with holdings of value less than Rs. 1,00,000 (such reduction in the holding may have been due to fall in prices or his having offloaded a part of the holdings previously), are allowed to off load their holding to the Market Maker in that scrip. (provided that the investor sells his entire holding in that scrip in one lot). Market Makers will be authorised to buy these shares from such investors.
Makes managing points 6 & 8 that much easier. !! LOL..
Ø 18. Preparation and submission of financial results (as mandated in the listing agreement) on a “half yearly basis” for SMEs, instead of “quarterly basis”.
Why cant they publish them monthly - what are they saving here? Any company has a status report daily in any case and so dont see the need for this relaxation.
Ø 19. All the provisions of clause 49 (corporate governance) need to be complied with.
First sensible guideline but then a true case of too little too late??
In short a pathetic attempt at pulling the wool over the investors eyes and coming from the market regulator - this is a new low for Indian capitalism!!
The biggest scam in this is the paid in capital as the benchmark. For eg. a company like MRF has a paid in capital of 4 crores. But its market cap is in excess of 2400Crores. So should not the definition be a combination of paid in equity and market cap say paid in equity of 25 crores and a market cap below 500crores or some such thing? DUH!!